SeNoLD Posted January 20, 2023 Share Posted January 20, 2023 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedd Johnson Posted January 20, 2023 Share Posted January 20, 2023 While extremely impressive, that isn't an Inch Dumbell. Regardless, incredible strength to literally pull directly to the top of the shoulder. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Knowlton Posted January 20, 2023 Share Posted January 20, 2023 supper strong killer lifts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeNoLD Posted January 20, 2023 Author Share Posted January 20, 2023 4 hours ago, Jedd Johnson said: While extremely impressive, that isn't an Inch Dumbell. Regardless, incredible strength to literally pull directly to the top of the shoulder. I didn't notice the difference because of the shape. Much more is solved by the fact that there is a clean metal handle, without paint, so it's easier to lift 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hubgeezer Posted January 22, 2023 Share Posted January 22, 2023 On 1/20/2023 at 9:15 AM, SeNoLD said: I didn't notice the difference because of the shape. Much more is solved by the fact that there is a clean metal handle, without paint, so it's easier to lift Way back, in 2011, on the IronMind Forum, a gripster from the UK by the name of Paul Wood posted a link to very complicated scientific explanation of why the solid round bells were the most difficult of shapes. The term was “Rotational Kinetic Energy”. I don’t pretend to understand it, but I believe it. I agree with Jeff’s comments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hubgeezer Posted January 22, 2023 Share Posted January 22, 2023 3 minutes ago, Hubgeezer said: Way back, in 2011, on the IronMind Forum, a gripster from the UK by the name of Paul Wood posted a link to very complicated scientific explanation of why the solid round bells were the most difficult of shapes. The term was “Rotational Kinetic Energy”. I don’t pretend to understand it, but I believe it. I agree with Jeff’s comments. On the other hand the that second video looks like there would plenty of Rotational Kinetic working against him! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeNoLD Posted January 23, 2023 Author Share Posted January 23, 2023 10 hours ago, Hubgeezer said: Way back, in 2011, on the IronMind Forum, a gripster from the UK by the name of Paul Wood posted a link to very complicated scientific explanation of why the solid round bells were the most difficult of shapes. The term was “Rotational Kinetic Energy”. I don’t pretend to understand it, but I believe it. I agree with Jeff’s comments. The force of rotation of different projectiles can be felt most vividly by comparing the lifting of the classic axle on wheels and axle with plates. They give completely different sensations when clean. When the difference is 1-2 cm, it makes no sense to talk about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kashtan Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 (edited) Incredible effort! At last WR of Mike Burke is break! Edited January 24, 2023 by Kashtan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.