Jump to content

Inverted Close


mrgiarpi

Recommended Posts

hello. What do you think about inverted close?for me it is easier. For example, i can close 5 times the coc#2 in inverted position but only 1 maybe 2 times in the "regular" position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's likely that you are somehow gaining better leverage with your inverted close. Because of this, I would assume that you "regular position" set could be substantially improved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm right handed and inverted is easier for me left handed but harder right handed. You might have weak ring/pinkey fingers right now that are limiting your regular close?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm right handed and inverted is easier for me left handed but harder right handed. You might have weak ring/pinkey fingers right now that are limiting your regular close?

yes, i think so. Also i progress faster using inverted only closes in my training routine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a mechanical leverage position and with having the strongest two fingers in the best position with a bit of getting used to you should do quite well increasing reps as opposed to the conventional closing position. R. Sorin

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a mechanical leverage position and with having the strongest two fingers in the best position with a bit of getting used to you should do quite well increasing reps as opposed to the conventional closing position. R. Sorin

I agree with what Richard is saying here.

I've always done well with grippers inverted due to my strong RP fingers I constantly

trained during my AW'ing competition days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a mechanical leverage position and with having the strongest two fingers in the best position with a bit of getting used to you should do quite well increasing reps as opposed to the conventional closing position. R. Sorin

I would never have guessed that. My thought process on the inverted close...you are providing your weakest digit the very worst leverage possible therefor nearly negating any real crush strength the pinky has to offer whereas the conventional position does the opposite.

But I certainly wouldn't argue the point against Richard and Joe. My newbie clothes are still dripping off of me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think of it as a torque multiplier. The strong fingers get a higher torque rating obviously in the inverted position. This is going to provide an overall higher torque rating than the normal gripper position.

Let's make up some fake numbers for conversations sake:

Index can produce 288 lbs

Middle 240

Ring 168

Pinky 72

If the axis of rotation is at the center of the spring then I'm just going to guess (no gripper in front of me to measure) that the radius to the end of the handle 5".

So if we assume that the center of our fingers are at the 2", 3", 4" and 5" location of the handle then we can see how force can be summed in the normal and inverted position.

Normal

(288 lb x 2") + (240 x 3) + (168 x 4) + (72 x 5) = 2328 inch pounds = 194 foot pounds

Inverted

(288 lb x 5") + (240 x 4) + (168 x 3) + (72 x 2) = 3048 inch pounds = 254 foot pounds

The inverted position takes greater advantage of the strong fingers. The math is just made up numbers, hell maybe it's all wrong to begin with. But that's the best way I make sense of the situation.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if you take into consideration how much the pinky and ring are in a normal gripper close you can see that any little bit of progress with those 2 fingers multiplies out to a significant degree. Train those last 2 fingers boys. (This coming from a guy who has the weakest last two fingers. Soon to be fixed.)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ow...brain hurts. lol Nah, I get what you are saying...thanks for taking the time to create an example.

But...if this is the case, then aren't we also saying that Magnus could close the #4 easier inverted (since he left his pinky off anyway).

I can't put my finger (or pinky) on it, but something the mechanics of it still doesn't jive with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it only works for MMS. A TNS close requires one to reel in the handle to then be fully able to grab it to finish the close. Reeling in a gripper with the pinky is not going to happen. Well, at least that's the case for us with mortal hands. His hands were so big he could probably do many things with a gripper. Just like we see new people doing well inverted, we see some people do 3 finger closes better than they can with all 4 fingers simply because the pinky is so weak it's easier to let it hang and just slide the fingers down for better leverage to make up for it. If you look at the guys closing the bigger grippers you won't see them doing inverted closes or 3 finger closes. Well, unless you're Silverdouche doing a filed #3.5 CCS 3 finger. :dry

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy policies.