Buzz-T Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Hi @ all, I have a question: Can you compare a RB 180 to a CoC #2? Or is it a RB 160? Thx 4 answers:-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerryg Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Keep in mind that grippers vary but the RB180 should be in the same range as a coc #2, I do own a RB160 that is a tougher close than my RB180 and coc #2s though??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Electron Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I say RB160. RB240 would be #3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chez Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I say RB160. RB240 would be #3. I have an RB 240 that is only slightly harder than my #2.5. They really vary too much to say. IM and GHP grippers vary the least of any of the top grippers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cannon Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 I think that RB240 is generally easier than most #3s. I know I closed one long before I closed any #3s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brett H Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 Wow, RB must have a great variance. My RB130 is quite a bit easier than a #1. Surprising the RB160 would be comparable to a #2. That is a large gap if this is correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jchapman Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 I have an RB 160 that is between a #2 and #2.5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.