william Posted August 9, 2007 Posted August 9, 2007 I know that grippers vary, but I wondered if people who have tried both think that the RB 260N tends to be more difficult then a RB 240(regular spread)? I am ordering 5 RB grippers and I wanted the full range from #1.5 to #3. I am getting a RB 160, 180, 210, 240N, and 260N, and I hope that I did not skip a step by getting the 260N instead of 240. Thank-you, William Quote
egg_uk Posted August 9, 2007 Posted August 9, 2007 my rb160 is harder than my 2, and my rb 180 isnt a whole lot harder than the 160 maybe .01-0.2 on the coc scale Quote Goals Get Stronger Lift what I haven't lifted Close what I haven't closed
GetAGrip87 Posted August 9, 2007 Posted August 9, 2007 My RB240 is a little harder than my RB260N. Quote Scott Harris Jr. 5'6" 150lbs. My Training Has Completely Switched Gears! 2012 Goals: ... Get Back to 154's 143's for Nationals???
greenBuddah Posted August 10, 2007 Posted August 10, 2007 My Rb260 is easier than my #3; avg. should be harder though. I often hear about 240s being harder as #3s. Quote
CoC#3 Posted August 10, 2007 Posted August 10, 2007 RB240s vary. Most are around a #3. RB260n - only tried one. Easier than every #3 i have closed. RB260 - most are a little stiffer than an average #3 at the close. Quote real name: Sam Solomi
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.