Roark Posted February 11, 2002 Share Posted February 11, 2002 Strongman Andre Brandeli, known also as Little Andre witnessed Apollon perform the following feat of strength for Mr. Marchand. After Brandeli performance at the Follies- Bergere. "Apollon took four authentic 20-kilo weights and stuck his fingers through the rings without tying them together with cords as was usual, and then using just one hand, he pressed the 80 kilos three times in a row. He then asked Mr. Marchand if that was enough. Apollon did not perform this feat in public because the weights hurt his hand too much." Although the cleaning of this 176 pound cluster weight is not mentioned, I submit that anyone capable of such other- worldly finger strength would not be stopped by a 2.38" diameter bar weighing four pounds less. Imagine the hand LENGTH needed to accomplish grasping four separate weights! This from Desbonnet's book THE KINGS OF STRENGTH. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan Say Posted February 11, 2002 Share Posted February 11, 2002 Roark, don't you mean 'Le Roi de Force'? :p :hehe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supersqueeze Posted February 11, 2002 Share Posted February 11, 2002 Roark - I'm a little unclear on what exactly was done in this lift. Does it say how many, or which fingers were used? The whole issue hand position and configuration is not clear to me. - Mike M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roark Posted February 12, 2002 Author Share Posted February 12, 2002 supersqueeze, The weights were 'ringweights'- that is a circular ring affixed loosely to a block weight. Looked like the modern weights that the Highland Games competitors throw for height. So you place four weights in a square next to each other, lean all four handles toward a common center, and if you do not have long fingers you will not be able to even hook each of the separate handles, but Apollon's hands were 9" long, so I am not sure how his hand was configured, but of course at least four fingers would be required to grasp four handles thus spaced. I have two 50 lb scale weights with solid fixed handles, and trying to put those handles together and clamp on to them with one hand is painful. What Apollon did was beyond description strong! He often did this same stunt after tying a cord thru the rings and then swung the weight by grasping the cord- still stupendous but not nearly as difficult as using no cord. Nathan Say, Yes, LES ROIS de la FORCE, the 1911 book. I have never heard of anyone else duplicating this feat by Apollon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1stCoC Posted February 12, 2002 Share Posted February 12, 2002 During a visit from John Brookfield I tried an odd lift(actually minutes after closing the Phantom 4) of crossing the handles of two solid round globe dumbells by slipping my fingers around this awkward two layered mess and deadlifting it. It REALLY hurt due to the cramped, odd position(only one finger grasping the lower handle) The weights were weighed and were 132 and 134 lbs. each. Brian Harvey(a CoC) dropped in last night while I was working out and said he would come by today and play with some of my toys. I'll keep ya' posted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roark Posted February 12, 2002 Author Share Posted February 12, 2002 Richard, in my opinion, and let me emphacize, my opinion, you are being robbed of your rightful place in the crushing scheme of things. I believe you closed the 621 pound gripper; I further believe that 621 is in excess of what Joe Kinney closed when he closed the #4. I was excited to call Brookfield to get his verification on you closing the 621, and when he stated that it may have happened but that he simply did not recall it, I was baffled because you had referred me to him as a witness. Kinney's #4 has not been tested, and I suspect never will be, and this will force his ranking to go to the bottom of the list of those who will eventually also close a #4 which has been calibrated. If no one has a #4 calibrated, then Joe's name should stay at the top of the list. In no way is this meant to disparage Kinney for whom I have incredible respect for crushing strength. It is meant to elevate you to your rightful place as probably the greatest exponent of crushing strength we have yet known. Some will say that you are 'past your peak'- I have no way of knowing that. But even if you are, we should consider how long that peak lasted! Amazing. Before people attack me for these statements, again I say this is my opinion which I feel welcome to, especially knowing of your long successful involvement in hand strength in all its aspects. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supersqueeze Posted February 12, 2002 Share Posted February 12, 2002 Roark - I, for one, will not attack you. Your comparison between RS and others is much more diplomatic than mine would be. -Mike M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terminator Posted February 12, 2002 Share Posted February 12, 2002 Roark, Doubt, doublecheck, decide......your words. Did you forget about the first two in this case? Also, I thought we were done relying on IP numbers, reality shows they are seriously flawed at best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roark Posted February 12, 2002 Author Share Posted February 12, 2002 terminator, You have a point about the IP numbers, though I do not know what it is because some of these calculations are beyond me. This is not sarcasm, because you may be totally right. I simply don't know. Regarding doubt and doublecheck. My opinion is to not doubt Richard and the 621 in this case. I spoke to a woman who witnessed him closing it, or at least the one Richard says he closed in front of her, and she saw the handles touch. Now Richard may have pulled a switch, but in my opinion, he did not, and is a man on honor. That is my opinion, and it is only that. You have a right to disagree, and I will not argue on matters of opinion; I'm expressing mine as a show of respect for Richard Sorin. Regarding doublecheck. Well, in this case, the only checking I was able to do was with the woman to whom Richard referred me and to John Brookfield. The woman verified the squeeze, John did not, though John did not deny it may have happened just that he could not recall it happening.. The only other doublechecking is along the lines of Richard's other known, witnessed, hand strength feats, and I rush to add that those other feats do not PROVE the 621. But they do give Richard credibility to be at that level. As the old saying goes:"It is with our judgments as with our watches; no two go just the same, yet each believes his own." So if you, and everybody else on this board disagree with me, no argument from me; just expressing an opinion. I do not for a moment claim to be able to prove this opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest woody36 Posted February 12, 2002 Share Posted February 12, 2002 Joe, If i can play Devils Advocate, with the debate over the inch lift,would you have taken the word of some woman who said she had witnessed the lift,or would your instincts as an historian lead you to question what she in fact saw, and which bell was used? ps:I believe the closing of the gripper took place,witness or not. Best regards Ray. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terminator Posted February 12, 2002 Share Posted February 12, 2002 Roark, Howdy! I do not doubt Richard's strength or his honor. Respect him, that goes without saying, he's one of the guys who motivates me in this game. Regardless, independent verification is required for something this important. I discount the woman's account who witnessed the close, only because she may have not been privy to the rules of a legitimate close (no additional part of body touching arm etc.). I never thought RS would pull a switcheroo in any manner. I would expect a man such as Brookfield to remember such a significant feat in grip history, remember this probably happened before Kinney's closure. As for the great IP debate, the science and formulas obscure what is becoming more clear. In a blind test (squeeze), it is difficult to match the grippers with their IP numbers. I have seen a pretty large range of numbers through exchanges with other COC's. The hand ranking, which to me is what I would use for a training progression anyway, doesn't seem to coincide with the IP numbers. Bottom line, if I have seen a 400 (I have) that was easier to close than a 292 (it was), I'm gonna tell you that. Or a 430 something that's impossible, harder than a 473 that's nearly impossible, I'll tell you that too. I wish it was as cut and dried as a calibrated barbell plate. Pleasure talking to you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roark Posted February 12, 2002 Author Share Posted February 12, 2002 Woody, You have a point. But in Inch's case, there is such a preponderence of evidence that PROVES he switched bells often, that we do not have to rely on word of mouth evidence, female or male. He switched bells, he switched details, he switched time frames, he switched details on what types of lifts he performed with the bell, he switched off the genuine possibility that several men were far more able than he to lift the 172. I hesitated before posting the opinion about Sorin, but he has not been guilty, so far as I am aware, of switching weights to make false claims, or in never having handy the very implements that he claims to be able to lift. He has, quite literally, put down a gauntlet as his business. Unlike Inch, Richard walks the walk. Again, this is my opinion. It isn't like I'm claiming that one of the men who lives down the street, about whom I know nothing strength-wise, could have closed the 621. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roark Posted February 12, 2002 Author Share Posted February 12, 2002 terminator, Let me be candid. Richard was very enthusiastic about me contacting Brookfield because Richard said to me that John would remember the incident. Richard and John were walking thru Richard's business and John urged Richard to try to close the gripper (621). So Richard gave it his all and John said (paraphrasing) 'You did it! You closed it!" This was according to Richard. Quite frankly, Richard was so excited about John being able to verify this, that in the back of my mind, the thought popped in about perhaps they had already discussed this and John was waiting for a call. So I was expecting John to verify what Richard told me. When John said he could not recall such an incident, I was almost speechless. And confused. I do not think either man is lying; perhaps memories play tricks. I know mine does. The whole situation is bewildering and saddening. It just so happens that I accept Richard could have, and did, close, the 621. Regarding the IP numbers, I don't have a clue. Best regards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest woody36 Posted February 12, 2002 Share Posted February 12, 2002 I agree entirely! Thanks Joe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terminator Posted February 12, 2002 Share Posted February 12, 2002 It's a mystery alright. Thanks for your candor. Pat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jeff Roark Posted February 12, 2002 Share Posted February 12, 2002 Does Richards 621 IP have a 4 stamped on the handles Joe? It just seems funny to me, although I beleive he closed it for some reason, that if a man did this feat, one of the greatest in history why wouldn't he get certified? Richard could you answer this question as you are here and post regularly? Joe do you beleive Kinneys close before you would Richards? Kinney provided a video with his, Richard is word of mouth and didn't even get that from Brookfeild. I just wish Heath would shut that #4 and prove it is doable. Or will people doubt his closure, like people has doubted Kinney? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roark Posted February 12, 2002 Author Share Posted February 12, 2002 Jeff, As I understand it, three prototypes of the gripper were made. One was sent to Richard, but he should tell this story. I will say this. It was sent to him as a joke, and when he told the manufacturer that yes, he had closed it, there was drop-jaw silence on the phone line. I believe both Kinney and Sorin have closed what amounts to a #4. The lesson to be learned from this is GET DOCUMENTATION! If you want 'official' credit, get witnesses, phots etc. altho photos don't prove a thing- the gripper could be wired shut and surrounded by a large hand hiding the wires. I can rig up a photo to show me closing the #3, or show me one hand deadlifting my Inch replica. Proves nothing, illustrates what could be an illusion. There is another young man on this board who closed the #3, and it almost took an act of congress to get him certified, though he has closed it many times. So the other lesson is that the reality is there are many people qualified to judge whether or not the handles have touched on a #3 or on a Trainer. I suspect that the huge majority of people who train on the grippers could so judge, as could anybody with decent eyesight. It is not calculus. No doubt many strong men have closed the #3 and not been certified. Mark Henry has closed it with each hand upright, and inverted. He is not certified. Terry Todd witnessed Mark closing it. Does Terry not have the senority in this sport to be a reliable judge? That's silly. Few people know more about strength and proper lifting than does Terry. How long is the course at Crusher College that delivers one to the door of the all-knowing? If a tree falls in the forest...if a #3 is closed with no ordained judge there to see it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1stCoC Posted February 13, 2002 Share Posted February 13, 2002 Guys I do apprecite your candid comments! I can start off by saying it has always been of upmost importance to me do things right...Whenever possible through my career I have weighed and measured any attempts I felt were of merit and would serve as a positive indicator for others to gauge their progress. I was grippin' when there were NO rules so we did the best we could in the early 90s grippers were not marked few used or knew of them AND the thing now referred to as a #4 didn't exist. For that matter I have some early UNMARKED 4s that I guess if I shut then wouldn't count either. As far as photos go they are not as reliable as a real person (hopefully a grip master) that KNOWS what it should look and feel like to do such a feat to be a witness. Believe me I wouldn't pick a man like John Brookfield to say was my witness if I didnt do it. Remember he was first introduced to grippers by me and it was very new to him.( on our first meeting could not do a #1).AFTER he saw my Phantom 4 on his second visit he then called Mr. Strossen and got one. I forget things too and he was "new" to the gripper scene.. Later, it was mentioned by John in his book that he gauged my crushing strength to be the best, mentioned AND witnessed me at the Old time Strongmans dinner along with a large crowd of world class gripsters close my old (527 IP) #3 with 2 fingers.(I did run across an OLD photo of me doing this in a workout and sent it to David Horn recently. I may be past my prime as some of you say but when visited by the Gentle Giant and fellow Captain of Crush Brian Harvey (#3 either hand And has visited Mr. Kinney personally) today he said this old man is the real deal. I would love to have any and all my fellow grip brothers feel, test, and try any of my grip equipment I have used and enjoyed over the years.In my heart I know what I have gone and I am content with that......Thanks to you all for you kind support! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Horne Posted February 13, 2002 Share Posted February 13, 2002 I was chatting to Arne Persson tonight, and told him as I have told many before, that I believe that Richard has the best crushing and thick pinching ability of the modern gripsters. I placed Richard Sorin 3rd in my all time list, and only Goerner and Uni bettered him!!!! David Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan Say Posted February 13, 2002 Share Posted February 13, 2002 Why would anyone doubt Richard's credibility? He's done lots of unbelievable things with witnesses. Just look at all the pics on the Sorinex site. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jeff Roark Posted February 13, 2002 Share Posted February 13, 2002 Thanks Richard for the reply, very well spoken. How far are from closing the phantom #4 now Richard? or are you secretly closing it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1stCoC Posted February 14, 2002 Share Posted February 14, 2002 Jeff thanks for the question about the 621. When it arrived I only knew the return address was Ironmind and it had a spring thicker than my #3. I was excited, tested it with a medium squeeze and it went down well.I was at my peak and thought if I shut this "thing" I should have a witness. It was mid afternoon and the gym was empty and my secretary out at lunch, The only person, a middle age female bodybuilder was present and I told her what a "good squeeze" consisted of. On my first try I came close and on my second I shut it .I did see the handles closed as well.The second time I ever tried an all out max was at the insistance of John Brookfield as we walked across the gym. He said it was closed , it felt closed to me but, my hand was down and out to my side so I did not eyeball it myself.Those were and are the only two hard tries I ever gave it. A great danger is present with an all out squeeze and I have been hurt many times so when a goal is met for me I dont push it much further. An interesting aside to the story about Mr.. Kinneys closing of his gripper.. a woman (his wife) also acted as his witness.Sometimes when great things happen it all can't be set up to be perfect for history.When I heard of the great feat I asked Mr. Strossen if he would like me to visit, witness AND congradulate Mr. Kinney and he said "no, I believe the man"so I or no other Captain of Crush witnessed his tremendous closings as far as I know. My 621 and my old threes await any of my fellow grip friends to try their luck with a piece of grip history.....and make their mark! Regards,RS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jeff Roark Posted February 14, 2002 Share Posted February 14, 2002 Thanks Richard. I am glad we have a legend that can speak for himself. Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest baldy Posted February 14, 2002 Share Posted February 14, 2002 Richard, I had heard that Kinney's wife acted as his witness. Strange that Strossen would not want to see that for himself (or have another CoC check it out thoroughly), feel the gripper, etc. As for your monster 621, you know you closed it and your reputation speaks for itself. If Kinney closed his #4 like he says, he knows what he did and no one can take it from him either. I definitely think that if someone is going to give him (relatively unknown before this) the benefit of the doubt, they should recognize your (you being a known grip master) closure as well. That is just my opinion. As for you being "past your prime" (maybe not the best choice of words), there is no offence meant towards you. That is basically what you are saying in the other discussion about anvil lifting. You closed your 621 when you were totally on top of your game. You may or may not not close it now but that doesn't change the fact that you *did* close it (more than once). It would be unfair for someone to say to you "if you really closed that 621 gripper, close this #4 right now". No one doubts that you are the "real deal", and no one thinks that you are "out of the picture". If you are currently at 90% of your best, you are still 200% ahead of most of us grip-wise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roark Posted February 14, 2002 Author Share Posted February 14, 2002 I spoke to the lady who witnessed Richard close the 621. She was not his wife. Perhaps that is the obstacle, Richard. Hmmm, what can you do about that... Seriously, one standard should not be employed for one claim and a variant, more difficult standard applied to Sorin. It is not difficult for me to make the jump from someone who can close a 527 gripper using two fingers and a thumb, to accepting that same hand using all the fingers and the added co-ordination that the hand working as a unit implies, closing the 621. Especially since it is Richard Sorin, and especially since we have a witness, however unmarried to each other they happen to be, which quite frankly, ADDS to the idea of objectivity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.