Roark Posted October 6, 2001 Share Posted October 6, 2001 David Willoughby May 1941 p 23 in VIM magazine about Apollon [Louis Uni] "...make it fairly safe to conclude that in all-round tests of hand, finger, wrist, forearm and gripping strength, he was supreme." Earlier in that same article Leo Gaudreau wrote on page 13, something that whets the curiosity, and hopefully someone on the board will have further info. As we know, John Grun Marx had a challenge dumbell of 143 lbs that had a 2.75" diamter handle, so was it about Marx and his challenge bell that Leo wrote the following about Apollon?: "Another owner of a challenge weight, saw Apollon swing his dumbbell 13 times in succession. 143 lbs. this one." If this was Marx's bell, and Apollon repped it 13 times in the swing, what would he have done to the Inch bell ?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arne Posted October 6, 2001 Share Posted October 6, 2001 Roark. Do You think Apollons allround grip was stronger than Görners? Arne Persson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roark Posted October 6, 2001 Author Share Posted October 6, 2001 Arne, Yes, in all-round feats of hand/grip strength, including the lifting of thick handled bells, without any doubt in my mind, Apollon was king. On the occasion when Apollon squeezed a dynanometer and registered less than Goerner, we need to keep two things in mind: Apollon could not be prodded into attempting feats just for the sake of attempting them (unless he was angered) And, His effort on the dyna was ha;f-hearted and he claimed it hurt his hand and would not try a second time; further, how shall I say this,...there seems to be more credence with the feats of Apollon than of Goerner, at least among those writers of history that I consider most trustworthy to detail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Black Posted October 6, 2001 Share Posted October 6, 2001 Joe, Willoughby wrote in "The Super Athletes" that Marx owned both a 143-pound dumbbell and a 132-pound dumbbell, each with a 2.75" handle. Was the article clear that it was the 143-pound dumbbell that was used? Swinging either of these bells 13 times would be impressive. Speaking of dynanometers, I had the opportunity to squeeze one in a Doctor's office and I was above the numbers reported by Willoughby for Apollon and Gorner. The one I squeezed must have been defective or overly used and the spring was degraded, I am not claiming a grip stronger than the above listed . I did this before I got the book, and was very surprised at the numbers reported for these men when I received the Super Athletes. One thing that was interesting about the device was that I felt the pain of the handle would have been a factor for me if not for my nail bending. I felt that my readings were high because I withstood a lot of pain to get them. I wrote down the readings in my old Journal, it may take awhile before I can find them. The device I used looked identical to the one on page 232 of the book, but was a different brand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarBender Posted October 6, 2001 Share Posted October 6, 2001 Apollon was also known to avoid dipping under a weight which is allowed for swings, cleans, and snatches. Also, backloading the dumbbell is supposed to make the swing easier but these challenge dumbbells were not constructed this way. I believe that Apollon could have easily cleaned the Inch DB to his shoulder had he been granted the opportunity. Perhaps Inch's challenge was intended for the general public and the likes of Arthur Saxon and Apollon were understood to be excluded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roark Posted October 6, 2001 Author Share Posted October 6, 2001 BarBender, Good point about Apollon's disdain for dipping under the weight, and for that matter his minimal use of leg thrust for overhead lifting, and no splitting the legs but leaving the feet beside each other so to speak. But, a challenge with a thick handled 172 pound bell directed only at the general public would have been pointless, I suspect. And Inch, in writing about the men who failed with the bell, never to my knowledge wrote that hundreds of 'average men' failed to lift the bell, but did claim that hundreds of strong men failed to. Further, Inch traded on Saxon's claimed failure to lift the bell, and said that when he (Inch) met Apollon, the latter was past his prime, so that Inch thought it unbecoming to challenge Apollon with the bell. The text I began this thread with does mention a challenge bell of 143 lbs, but it did not specify to whom that bell belonged. I am guessing it was Marx's. Marx knew how to trip Apollon's trigger and get Apollon to exert himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.